• Home
  • About Us
    • History
    • Meet Us
      • David A. Dickinson, President
      • Denise Wiese, Consultant
      • Jerod Moyer, Consultant
      • Amy Kudlacek, Consultant
      • Steve Doty, Consultant
      • Deb Jost, Consultant
      • Bob Sutton, Consultant
    • Contact Us
  • Services
  • Reviews
  • Products
    • Seminars
    • Compliance Manuals
    • Other Products
  • Seminars
  • Compliance Resources
    • Compliance Links
    • Free Downloads
  • Banking on BCC
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
    • Overdraft Protection Act - Take 1
    • ATM / Reg E Signage Revisited
    • Changes Coming for the 2012 Fall Lending Seminar
    • CFPB: Fair Lending is Alive and Well!
    • Provisional Credit: Reg E, Visa & MasterCard
    • CRA Public File Update 2012
    • Update on Combined TIL/RESPA Disclosures
    • The "Big Dog" Is Checking Into Overdrafts
    • HMDA Mixed Use Properties
    • Another Day, Another Overdraft Update
    • 2012 HMDA Threshold Announced
    • Overdraft Chaos Update...Some Good News, Some Bad News
    • Classifying Home Improvement Loans
    • Overdraft Restitution Update
    • HMDA - Reporting GMI for "Entities"
    • CFPB Regs Issued
    • 2012 CRA Threshold Updated
    • 2012 HOEPA
    • Reg Z & Reg M Thresholds Effective January 1
    • NFIP Extended Again - Are You Getting Tired of This Yet?
    • OFAC Search Tool

Blog

Overdraft Chaos Update...Some Good News, Some Bad News

Jerod Moyer

By Jerod Moyer

While we don’t have anything “official” from the FDIC (this has been their baby) or any other regulatory agency, the ABA has posted an update (The Compliance Source 2/14/12) on the recent overdraft chaos.  We addressed the issues in our December 2011 newsletter and recently posted a blog as well on the topic. 

First the good news… 

“[The] FDIC DC has not authorized its examiners to cite UDAP violations where banks actually have a bona-fide discretionary overdraft service for covering one-time debit-card transactions (such as an automated overdraft program, promoted or not) even though customers who opt-in are charged an overdraft fee for “force pay” situations whereas customers who did not opt-in have the same “force pay” transactions covered without a fee.”  

In plain English, if you have something to offer (i.e. Bounce Protection, Overdraft Defender, etc.) you’re good to go, even with respect to opt-ins and force pay transactions.  An examiner should not be threatening you with UDAP!

 

And, the bad news…

 

There still remains a UDAP issue for those of you who provided an opt-in bit did not provide an actual benefit to the consumer. 

 

“[The] FDIC DC has permitted its examiners to apply UDAP analysis where banks with a policy and practice of not paying ATM or one-time debit card transactions into overdraft, which the FDIC describes as “no-pay” banks, charge overdraft fees in a force-pay situation to customers who opted-in to an “overdraft service” using the Model A-9 notice. The FDIC asserts that this constitutes legal deception because the bank’s no-pay policy really means it does not provide discretionary overdraft protection coverage for debit card transactions.”

 And last but not least, we’ll continue to hold out hope for some type of official guidance from a regulatory agency in the near future:

 “FDIC expects to clarify instructions to examiners about how these “no pay” situations should be handled from a supervisory standpoint on a going-forward basis.”

Stay Tuned!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted on February 13th, 2012 at 1:36 pm. RSS | Back to Blog Homepage.


View this document online at: http://www.bankerscompliance.com/blog/overdraft-chaos-update.htm
© 2012 Bankers Compliance Consulting
All Rights Reserved.